- Price = what is traded off
- Who's "more efficient" at making each good?
- really means who incurs the smaller trade-off
- What is sacrificed?
- (10 wines 5 cameras) Rochester: Price of 1 camera = 2 wines Price of 1 wine = 1/2 camera
- (3 wines 4 cameras) Cornell: Price of 1 camera = 3/4 wine Price of 1 wine = 4/3 camera
- Therefore, Rochester has a "comparative advantage" in making wine over Cornell
- comparative advantage = ability to produce something giving up less resources than other producers
- No producer can have a comparative advantage in producing everything
- Cornell has a comparative advantage in making cameras over Rochester
- You pay for your imports with your exports always
- What matters in trade is the relative price differences within a country
- Policies that restrict trade make people poor
- Two ways for states to get rich
- have almost everyone working
- improve the productivity of every worker in the state
- the better option
- Why are there less jobs today
- technology replaces workers
- many products need technological production
- low paying jobs fill up fast or get offshored
Monday, October 24, 2011
10/24/11
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment